Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-5158113-20131103020610/@comment-24003266-20131108063700

LuxRegem wrote: For a short conclusion of my opinion:

Skip non-fusable / unfusable / non-craftable / uncraftable as categories because they only tell what the armours are not.

Skip craftable as a category because it is too ambiguous.

Instead use categories storyline armour / epic boss armour / Starmetal Raiments.

It is still useful to have craftable / fusable / obtainable by chance chest in the properties on the armours page.

I have only browsed this wiki a few weeks and only registered a few days ago so I don't know the whole wiki yet. But is there an armour-facebook page on this wiki where we can find pictures of all known armours and links to their pages?

Regardless of what the categories are called/titled they need to be clearly defined to standardize how they are applied; it's clear by this discussion that the categories alone could mean different things to different folks, leaving those not in the know w/out potentially important info. For example, the distinction of whether an armor is craftable or not is important b/c non-craftable armors generally have better stats than craftable sets. This used to be relatively evident b4 recent Epic Boss stats started creeping upward, yet the plus versions of non-craftables are still better than EB+ armors. Also, craftable is not ambiguous, even expired Epic Boss materials can be obtained through the summoning stone (even though it is a completely ridiculous way to gain mats) as long as you've 'Unlocked the Epic Boss' you can always visit the Summoning Stone for mats. Since many older Epic Boss armors are now included in the fusion equation, knowing whether that particular armor was craftable or not would give you an indication about that armor's relative quality.

As for fusion, I think the entire discussion was reset in back in Sept when GREE removed all Epics from the fusion equation. It no longer matters that a certain armor used to be fusable, folks only care about what they are now able to fuse again as GREE progressively releases Epics to fusion. Again, if we qualify as part of the fusion definition that all listed info is pertinent to fusion results since mid-Sept, and that new armors willl be added as confirmed, there shouldn't be any confusion. As for the most up-to-date info regarding what is newly fusable, this will have to be a dynamic aspect of this page(s); hopefully the community will remain active enough to keep it relatively current. However, there also needs to be a standard by which fusion results are confirmed b4 they are listed as such. These confirmations also need to be date stamped for reference.

Also, there have been several threads started to document fusion results, good and bad, but it would be nice to have a repository related to fusion results that could be accessed via this category or related pages.