Board Thread:Game Discussions/@comment-24738360-20140826201022/@comment-23.118.174.183-20140827021031

173.217.36.246 wrote: Trying to be constructive, if it was offered at $25, or. $50 or $75 would it tempt you?

What if it was Druidic+?

I'm asking because it's being discussed on the game forums. Maybe if we tell them what were really willing to pay for, we might get it? These are the only conditions I believe fit in the category "tempting" and affordable.

1) Plus versions. Nothing less.

2) Old war epics, like Blazestone, Soulshard for $50-100

3) Old fusible epics for $15-25

4) Newer epics for $100-150, maybe $200

I personally will not pay anything for virtual armors that should in all honestly not cost more than $5-10, but hey, there are people willing to spend much more for them. I believe these are reasonable conditions for them. Again, these do not cost much to create for the company. The cost vs. the profit is pretty big here at $100.

Its about time the chance fusing epics and getting epics from chests increases (and no I don't mean 4x to 20x, i mean the REAL percentage). There is already a big gap in competition between F2P vs. those that pay to win. Make that gap smaller. Add more competitiveness to this...unless of course the ONLY goal is to make more money and not deliver a smooth game.