Board Thread:Game Discussions/@comment-24196398-20140130213608/@comment-184.18.201.226-20140514183323

23.118.174.183 wrote: 58.120.230.151 wrote: ...weird definition of free-to-play. Dude, free-to-play only means that you are free to play it. Sorry buddy, but that doesn't entitle you to have a chance at everything a paying player can get. Just about every free-to-play game has premium content reserved for just the players that keep the game going. As one with no war epics, I do feel the pain of those with chest epics that become fuseable but you really have to know that there is a difference. Chest epics are just about as strong as the war epics but the difference is that war epics are not just about the strength. The value of an armor of the devoted which is outclassed now by many epics is not that it was strong but that it is a trophy showing that your guild won in that war. I can totally understand why those with war epics are upset about them being handed out as it removes any remaining value for those epics.

That being said one way I could see it being acceptable is (*note Gree will never do this because it requires more work than nothing) make a similar new design for war epics removing one detail or something and make these fuseable so that you can tell the difference between those gained by fusion and those gained by war.

Looks like GREE did not think my definition of free-to-play was weird. We got a chance at back to back War epics in the arena. but you are still required to spend a shit ton of gems to get top 3 in arena. so your argument still remains invalid.