Thread:FrosteeSnoman/@comment-7211845-20140526213507

Hi Frostee, couldn't meet you in chat so I guess I'll write everything down here.

Bureaucrat Nominations: Almost a month ago, JustinDaone left the wikia and appointed you as bureaucrat. You promised that there will be more staff, particularly bureaucrats. Justin told you to shut the nomination thread and you did so. However you said we will wait for Justin before any major promotion takes place. It has been a month now and the wiki cannot delay because of Justin. I agree that his secular leave was utmost necessary but we must not wait for Justin's return. I believe you agree. I'm not asking for the role, I'm saying a community discussion should be open for the community letting them vote for a bureaucrat. Don't get me wrong, you are a great bureaucrat and friend, but we must not keep the wiki behind.

Admin Nominations: I've added a second option for requirements(optional). It is

A user can qualify if he/she has been a rollback for three months or a chat mod for three months"

I hope you like it. As mentioned it is not required but it can be a second option for candidates who are not rollbacks to have a chance since they are well trusted by the community.

Epic Boss Pestilence: Should he be allowed to edit Rage of Immortals wiki?

Nominations in general: Frostee, I am concerned about the part in any nomination that says the user cannot vote if blocked. I find this a bit excluding despite the fact that the user has broken the law once. What if that user has reformed? What if the community appreciates him? What if he makes good edits? I believe that these type of people should be given another chance. I agree that multiple blocked spammer users shouldn't be allowed, but just one block for a day or a week? Will this really benefit our warm-welcoming wiki.

Chat Moderator Nominations: I think you thought about this a bit too fast. Yes I agree that your intentions were good and you were only doing it for the benefit of the wiki but I think we should really cool down with this thread. I mean, It's happening again, many inactive users just came to grab the user right, without any knowledge of what it is or it's responsibilities. I think the rules are a bit to charitable and easy. The nomination rules must be a little more strict. For example, users should be on the wiki for 3 months in order to become a mod and users should have one kudos from either one Moderator or Administrator in order to move on to the discussion board. As of this moment, I feel that User:Bonaya or User:Zellox is most suitable for the position. That would make four mods, which I think suffices for our wiki considering it's maturity.

I'm sorry that it is very lengthy but I hope you take all I said into thought :)

Good Day,

 