Thread:Kuby101/@comment-5012038-20130608205659

Kuby,

First of all I would like to say thank you for contributing to this wiki. Because of all your recent behavior and your eagerness to be an admin, I think I will have no choice but to clear things up with you.

I'm not sure how old are you but I can see from your activity here on this wiki you are not very mature in wiki editing and I will list them out why I say so.


 * 1) You don't check your edits after you publish them. Take this page for example, can you see the formatting error you did? It is a very common thing to check your edit after editing. Just a few is okey but I've seen quite a bit of it.
 * 2) The way you reply to message walls and threads. Just take the community consensus thread as an example, can you see how many times you contradict yourself in the comments? To me it seems like you always post replies without thinking properly.
 * 3) You imposed yourself as if you were granted admin rights. Take Coldoutcast's message wall as an example. It's great that you are help to warn users about any inappropriate behaviors. However, by saying you are going to delete his comment implies that you have the rights to delete his comments although you don't. It's like in real life let's say you are applying to be a policeman. As long as you application is not yet approved you can't just go out to the society and issue fines to the general public because you do not have the authority to do so.
 * 4) Rollback and bureaucrat voting thread. I know you edit on the Dragon Vale Wiki and use it a lot as a reference so I am going to use that wiki as an example. Did you notice that a discussion must be held before voting can take place? It's a fundamental rights of all contributors to be able to voice their opinions before they start voting on something. For the consensus thread for your adminship I am using one of the basic ways of getting consensus, that is to combine discussion and voting on the same thread. Because of the voting threads you created I can say you do not understand how consensus work.

I am writing this message because I think you require explanation for why I said you are inexperience. Normally in smaller wiki the founder will promote the people he/she see fit to admins until a community is formed and a proper community discussion can be held. I agree that this wiki will require maybe one more admin but at the moment to be frank with you I think leemuel is a better candidate for adminship. I decided to seek for community consensus and I abstained from voting because i think it will be fair to you but because of all your behaviors I afraid I will have to change my vote to oppose.

After said all that I will have to stress that it's great that you are still learning and editing so it makes you a keen contributor but when it comes to adminship I'm sorry to say I don't think you're suitable for the role for now. 